PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LIAU vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LIAU vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIAU achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


LIAU

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.65%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIAU vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LIAU and USOY is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LIAU vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIAU
LIAU Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LIAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIAU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LIAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIAU Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIAU vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LIAUUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.35

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

4.03

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.79

7.74

-5.95

LIAU vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIAU Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIAU and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LIAUUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

1.89

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.99

-1.29

Drawdowns

LIAU vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIAU drawdown since its inception was -9.95%, smaller than the maximum USOY drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIAU and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIAUUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-17.46%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

-14.29%

+8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-5.11%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-6.47%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

7.42%

-5.05%

Volatility

LIAU vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIAU) is 1.93%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that LIAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIAUUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

11.62%

-9.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.08%

27.18%

-22.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.22%

30.44%

-23.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.69%

26.13%

-17.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

26.13%

-17.44%

LIAU vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIAU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LIAU vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

LIAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LIAU
LifeX 2060 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF
9.36%12.93%1.04%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


LIAU and USOY have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to LIAU (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIAU dropped -9.95% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 57.29% vs 4.25% for LIAU. On fees, LIAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LIAU has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 57.29% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LIAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 9.36% for LIAU.

LIAU is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LIAU and 1.22% for USOY.

USOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LIAU and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer