LIAGX vs. CIGIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) and CIGIX (Calamos International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, LIAGX returned 21.75%/yr vs 25.69%/yr for CIGIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LIAGX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CIGIX.

Performance

LIAGX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LIAGX achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 34.54% return.

LIAGX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 10.09%
• YTD: 27.78%
• 6M: 28.66%
• 1Y: 41.65%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIGIX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 13.78%
• YTD: 34.54%
• 6M: 37.88%
• 1Y: 48.17%
• 3Y*: 25.69%
• 5Y*: 4.90%
• 10Y*: 10.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LIAGX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	27.78%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	34.54%	23.11%	12.51%	15.33%	-30.54%	-15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LIAGX and CIGIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021	0.95

The correlation between LIAGX and CIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LIAGX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 48
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CIGIX

CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 52
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LIAGX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LIAGX	CIGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.09	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.84	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	3.01	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	11.14	+0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LIAGX vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LIAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LIAGX and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LIAGX	CIGIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.09	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.38	+0.06

Drawdowns

LIAGX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LIAGX drawdown since its inception was -37.87%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIAGX and CIGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LIAGX	CIGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.87%	-64.46%	+26.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.56%	-15.88%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.11%	-19.38%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.24%	-15.29%	+2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	4.28%	-0.66%

Volatility

LIAGX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) is 8.29%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that LIAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LIAGX	CIGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.29%	9.54%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.01%	19.73%	-1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.68%	22.82%	-2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	21.07%	-2.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	19.98%	-1.19%

LIAGX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LIAGX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LIAGX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

LIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than CIGIX's 10.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	10.02%	13.49%	4.54%	0.28%	0.00%	0.33%	5.42%	0.00%	13.25%	3.76%	0.00%	0.13%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.30%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LIAGX and CIGIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, LIAGX and CIGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LIAGX or CIGIX?

CIGIX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to LIAGX (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIAGX dropped -37.87% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.