LI.PA vs. TSLI.L
LI.PA (Klepierre SA) is a stock, while TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Over the past year, LI.PA returned 18.90% vs 6.30% for TSLI.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LI.PA vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LI.PA is traded in EUR, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LI.PA achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly higher than TSLI.L's -21.73% return.
LI.PA
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 18.90%
- 3Y*
- 25.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
TSLI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- -21.73%
- 6M
- -23.75%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LI.PA vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 13.10% | 28.66% | 5.14% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | -21.73% | 1.89% | 32.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between LI.PA and TSLI.L is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LI.PA vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
LI.PA
TSLI.L
LI.PA vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LI.PA | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 0.19 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 0.40 | +3.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LI.PA vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LI.PA drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, which is greater than TSLI.L's maximum drawdown of -44.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI.PA and TSLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LI.PA | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.40% | -44.23% | -34.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -33.20% | +22.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -26.54% | +26.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.53% | -16.98% | -8.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 15.56% | -10.42% |
Volatility
LI.PA vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Klepierre SA (LI.PA) is 4.72%, while IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that LI.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LI.PA | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 10.54% | -5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 26.89% | -13.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 38.16% | -21.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 44.28% | -18.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.65% | 44.28% | -8.63% |
Dividends
LI.PA vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison
LI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than TSLI.L's 35.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 5.05% | 5.48% | 6.47% | 7.09% | 7.90% | 0.00% | 5.98% | 3.10% | 7.27% | 4.96% | 4.55% | 3.90% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | 35.17% | 55.94% | 5.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LI.PA and TSLI.L have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LI.PA and TSLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer