LI.PA vs. FEPG.L

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

LI.PA (Klepierre SA) is a stock, while FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by HANetf. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

LI.PA vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LI.PA is traded in EUR, while FEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEPG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI.PA achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than FEPG.L's -0.85% return.

LI.PA

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 9.35%
• 6M: 22.57%
• YTD: 18.93%
• 1Y: 22.87%
• 3Y*: 23.80%
• 5Y*: 20.23%
• 10Y*: 5.26%
• ALL TIME*: 5.10%

FEPG.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.49%
• 6M: 1.88%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LI.PA vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LI.PA Klepierre SA	18.93%	1.32%
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF	-0.85%	7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LI.PA and FEPG.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

LI.PA vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LI.PA

LI.PA Risk / Return Rank: 80
LI.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LI.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LI.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LI.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LI.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FEPG.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LI.PA vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LI.PA	FEPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	—	—

Drawdowns

LI.PA vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI.PA drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI.PA and FEPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LI.PA	FEPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.40%	-36.95%	-41.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-26.97%	+26.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.85%	-21.17%	-3.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LI.PA	FEPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.46%	46.36%	-29.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.60%	46.36%	-20.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.51%	46.36%	-10.85%

Dividends

LI.PA vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison

LI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than FEPG.L's 27.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF	27.80%	11.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LI.PA Klepierre SA	5.00%	5.48%	6.47%	7.09%	7.90%	0.00%	11.96%	3.10%	7.27%	4.96%	4.55%	3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LI.PA and FEPG.L in my portfolio?

LI.PA and FEPG.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.