PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LI.PA vs. CSWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LI.PA vs. CSWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LI.PA is traded in EUR, while CSWC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSWC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI.PA achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly lower than CSWC's 14.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LI.PA has underperformed CSWC with an annualized return of 4.49%, while CSWC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.81% annualized return.


LI.PA

1D
-0.22%
1M
5.94%
YTD
13.10%
6M
13.10%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
18.65%
10Y*
4.49%

CSWC

1D
0.00%
1M
3.18%
YTD
14.00%
6M
15.61%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
16.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LI.PA vs. CSWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LI.PA
Klepierre SA
13.10%28.66%21.24%24.35%11.69%13.38%-42.28%29.96%-22.08%3.31%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
15.56%0.72%8.88%51.42%-19.96%69.17%-9.67%25.57%35.60%-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LI.PA and CSWC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2007

0.14

The correlation between LI.PA and CSWC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LI.PA vs. CSWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LI.PA
LI.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LI.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LI.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

CSWC
CSWC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LI.PA vs. CSWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LI.PACSWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.49

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

4.80

-1.15

LI.PA vs. CSWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI.PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the CSWC Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI.PA and CSWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LI.PA vs. CSWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI.PA drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, which is greater than CSWC's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI.PA and CSWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LI.PACSWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.40%

-60.58%

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-14.91%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.27%

-28.32%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.92%

-28.32%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.00%

-60.58%

-10.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.75%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.53%

-15.01%

-10.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

4.61%

+0.53%

Volatility

LI.PA vs. CSWC - Volatility Comparison

Klepierre SA (LI.PA) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) at 4.39%. This indicates that LI.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LI.PACSWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.39%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

14.27%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

19.10%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.88%

22.89%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.65%

27.78%

+7.87%

Dividends

LI.PA vs. CSWC - Dividend Comparison

LI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than CSWC's 10.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
10.89%11.56%11.59%10.21%12.46%10.13%11.49%13.07%10.77%7.01%2.35%216.86%
LI.PA
Klepierre SA
5.05%5.48%6.47%7.09%7.90%0.00%5.98%3.10%7.27%4.96%4.55%3.90%

Financials

LI.PA vs. CSWC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Klepierre SA and Capital Southwest Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LI.PA values in EUR, CSWC values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


LI.PA and CSWC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LI.PA and CSWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer