PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LHYAX vs. LBNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LHYAX vs. LBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHYAX achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than LBNDX's 1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LHYAX has outperformed LBNDX with an annualized return of 4.61%, while LBNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.


LHYAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.48%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
4.61%

LBNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.99%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHYAX vs. LBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
1.86%7.44%7.25%9.84%-14.97%6.16%4.56%15.11%-5.10%8.53%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
1.63%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LHYAX and LBNDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 1998

0.79

The correlation between LHYAX and LBNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LHYAX vs. LBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHYAX
LHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHYAX vs. LBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LHYAXLBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.44

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.12

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

8.69

+3.51

LHYAX vs. LBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHYAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the LBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHYAX and LBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LHYAXLBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.14

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.36

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.86

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

1.10

+0.06

Drawdowns

LHYAX vs. LBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHYAX drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than LBNDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHYAX and LBNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHYAXLBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.68%

-26.67%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-4.08%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-4.51%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.67%

-17.33%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.23%

-19.77%

-4.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.36%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-3.52%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.99%

-0.32%

Volatility

LHYAX vs. LBNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) is 1.05%, while Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that LHYAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHYAXLBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.17%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

3.14%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

4.05%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.09%

4.69%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.73%

5.04%

+0.69%

LHYAX vs. LBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHYAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than LBNDX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

LHYAX vs. LBNDX - Dividend Comparison

LHYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, more than LBNDX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
6.04%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
7.20%7.13%6.02%5.84%4.60%4.91%5.15%5.47%6.29%5.65%5.85%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


LHYAX and LBNDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LBNDX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to LHYAX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LHYAX dropped -31.68% vs LBNDX's -26.67%.

LHYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LHYAX and LBNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer