LHYAX vs. AMECX
LHYAX (Lord Abbett High Yield Fund) and AMECX (American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A) are both mutual funds - LHYAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett, while AMECX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, LHYAX returned 4.52%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for AMECX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LHYAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for AMECX.
Performance
LHYAX vs. AMECX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LHYAX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than AMECX's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LHYAX has underperformed AMECX with an annualized return of 4.52%, while AMECX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.39% annualized return.
LHYAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
AMECX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
LHYAX vs. AMECX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHYAX Lord Abbett High Yield Fund | 1.54% | 7.44% | 7.25% | 9.84% | -14.97% | 6.16% | 4.56% | 15.11% | -5.10% | 8.53% |
AMECX American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A | 5.48% | 17.77% | 10.84% | 6.79% | -6.40% | 17.37% | 4.49% | 18.50% | -5.27% | 12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between LHYAX and AMECX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1998 | 0.43 |
The correlation between LHYAX and AMECX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LHYAX vs. AMECX — Risk / Return Rank
LHYAX
AMECX
LHYAX vs. AMECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LHYAX | AMECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.33 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.07 | 8.61 | +2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LHYAX vs. AMECX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LHYAX drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, smaller than the maximum AMECX drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHYAX and AMECX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LHYAX | AMECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -41.92% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -6.13% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.87% | -8.58% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -15.78% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.23% | -26.13% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -2.02% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -4.45% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 1.66% | -0.99% |
Volatility
LHYAX vs. AMECX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) is 0.97%, while American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that LHYAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LHYAX | AMECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 2.30% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 5.82% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 7.41% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 9.47% | -4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 10.69% | -4.96% |
LHYAX vs. AMECX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LHYAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than AMECX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
LHYAX vs. AMECX - Dividend Comparison
LHYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, less than AMECX's 9.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMECX American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A | 9.55% | 9.94% | 6.38% | 2.93% | 6.98% | 6.67% | 2.80% | 5.01% | 7.48% | 4.26% | 3.09% | 5.09% |
LHYAX Lord Abbett High Yield Fund | 7.22% | 7.13% | 6.02% | 5.84% | 4.60% | 4.91% | 5.15% | 5.47% | 6.29% | 5.65% | 5.85% | 6.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LHYAX and AMECX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMECX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to LHYAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LHYAX dropped -31.68% vs AMECX's -41.92%.
LHYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LHYAX and AMECX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer