LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LHTC.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - LHTC.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care while XDWH.DE tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LHTC.DE returned 5.88%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for XDWH.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LHTC.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.

Performance

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHTC.DE achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, LHTC.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 5.88%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.

LHTC.DE

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: 2.35%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 5.88%

XDWH.DE

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: -1.98%
• 6M: -1.51%
• 1Y: 9.79%
• 3Y*: 2.67%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: 7.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LHTC.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc	-2.55%	7.11%	3.92%	7.59%	-6.20%	25.48%	-1.95%	27.54%	2.95%	4.36%
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	-1.98%	2.21%	7.44%	0.04%	-0.07%	30.55%	2.69%	27.24%	5.96%	5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LHTC.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016	0.76

The correlation between LHTC.DE and XDWH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHTC.DE

LHTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 14
LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
LHTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
LHTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LHTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LHTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 13

XDWH.DE

XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 21
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LHTC.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	0.70	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	1.14	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.13	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	0.93	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	2.28	-1.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHTC.DE and XDWH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LHTC.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	0.70	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.41	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.51	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.55	-0.11

Drawdowns

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHTC.DE and XDWH.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LHTC.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.53%	-26.08%	-14.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-10.32%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.48%	-21.12%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.48%	-21.12%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.48%	-26.08%	-0.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.60%	-8.51%	-3.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-4.82%	-4.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.67%	4.20%	+1.47%

Volatility

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that LHTC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LHTC.DE	XDWH.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	4.81%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.67%	9.51%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.60%	13.69%	+2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.44%	13.43%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.57%	14.69%	+0.88%

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHTC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

LHTC.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LHTC.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LHTC.DE and XDWH.DE in my portfolio?

LHTC.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LHTC.DE or XDWH.DE?

On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LHTC.DE or XDWH.DE?

XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LHTC.DE.

What is the main difference between LHTC.DE and XDWH.DE?

LHTC.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LHTC.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.