PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHTC.DE achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than CBUF.DE's -2.22% return.


LHTC.DE

1D
3.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
5.88%

CBUF.DE

1D
2.74%
1M
3.65%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-1.56%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LHTC.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc
-2.55%7.11%3.92%7.59%-6.20%25.48%-1.95%10.19%
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
-2.22%2.56%0.75%0.33%2.09%30.42%2.79%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LHTC.DE and CBUF.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.76

The correlation between LHTC.DE and CBUF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHTC.DE
LHTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUF.DE
CBUF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LHTC.DECBUF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.10

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.68

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.89

1.56

-0.67

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHTC.DE and CBUF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LHTC.DECBUF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

0.53

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.34

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.44

0.00

Drawdowns

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, which is greater than CBUF.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHTC.DE and CBUF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LHTC.DECBUF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.53%

-25.94%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-10.87%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.48%

-21.76%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.48%

-21.76%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.60%

-9.66%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-5.65%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

4.74%

+0.93%

Volatility

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) at 4.98%. This indicates that LHTC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LHTC.DECBUF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

4.98%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

9.70%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

13.98%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

13.60%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

15.36%

+0.21%

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHTC.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUF.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

LHTC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Dividend Comparison

LHTC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.08%1.06%1.02%1.16%1.09%1.05%1.27%0.10%
LHTC.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LHTC.DE and CBUF.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LHTC.DE.

LHTC.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care, while CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LHTC.DE and 0.18% for CBUF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LHTC.DE and CBUF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer