PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist (LGWS.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF (VALD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGWS.DE achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly lower than VALD.DE's 10.40% return.


LGWS.DE

1D
0.43%
1M
2.56%
YTD
7.09%
6M
10.63%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*

VALD.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
10.40%
6M
13.25%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGWS.DE
Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist
7.09%37.06%9.12%14.07%-5.04%19.93%-7.89%19.62%-14.49%2.66%
VALD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF
10.40%23.55%9.24%14.99%-19.44%23.32%-12.12%17.75%-12.42%5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LGWS.DE and VALD.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017

0.89

The correlation between LGWS.DE and VALD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGWS.DE
LGWS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LGWS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGWS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGWS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LGWS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGWS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VALD.DE
VALD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VALD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VALD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist (LGWS.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF (VALD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGWS.DEVALD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.47

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.24

8.35

-0.12

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGWS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the VALD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGWS.DE and VALD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGWS.DEVALD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.62

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.54

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.39

+0.07

Drawdowns

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, roughly equal to the maximum VALD.DE drawdown of -41.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGWS.DE and VALD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGWS.DEVALD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-41.02%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-7.54%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.65%

-14.17%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.84%

-31.14%

+8.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.96%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-8.18%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.24%

+0.36%

Volatility

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist (LGWS.DE) is 3.59%, while BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF (VALD.DE) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that LGWS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VALD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGWS.DEVALD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.80%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

9.29%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.04%

11.54%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

14.41%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

15.89%

+2.04%

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGWS.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VALD.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGWS.DE vs. VALD.DE - Dividend Comparison

LGWS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than VALD.DE's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGWS.DE
Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist
3.07%3.29%4.24%0.00%4.69%2.83%2.72%4.37%4.77%0.38%
VALD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ESG Value Europe UCITS ETF
3.00%3.36%3.35%3.36%3.99%2.17%5.02%4.92%4.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGWS.DE and VALD.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VALD.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALD.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LGWS.DE.

LGWS.DE tracks MSCI EMU Value, while VALD.DE tracks BNP Paribas Value Europe ESG. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LGWS.DE and 0.30% for VALD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGWS.DE and VALD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer