PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist (LGWS.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGWS.DE
Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist
1.57%37.06%9.12%14.07%-5.04%19.93%-7.89%19.62%-14.49%2.66%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
-4.13%7.15%33.72%51.52%-29.87%39.59%34.60%42.84%3.18%9.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGWS.DE achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than LYMS.DE's -4.13% return.


LGWS.DE

1D
2.08%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
1.57%
6M
9.34%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*

LYMS.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
-1.87%
1Y
16.06%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
18.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGWS.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGWS.DE
LGWS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LGWS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGWS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGWS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LGWS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGWS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMS.DE
LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist (LGWS.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGWS.DELYMS.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.77

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

1.18

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.34

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.30

7.01

+0.28

LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGWS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGWS.DE and LYMS.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGWS.DELYMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.77

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.67

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.71

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between LGWS.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

LGWS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, while LYMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGWS.DE
Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist
3.24%3.29%4.24%0.00%4.69%2.83%2.72%4.37%4.77%0.38%0.00%0.00%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%

Drawdowns

LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGWS.DE and LYMS.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LGWS.DELYMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-50.00%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-10.02%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.84%

-31.12%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-7.48%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-8.85%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.34%

-0.48%

Volatility

LGWS.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF Dist (LGWS.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) at 4.76%. This indicates that LGWS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LGWS.DELYMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

4.76%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

11.90%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

20.73%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

19.91%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

19.69%

-1.70%