PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGVAX vs. TMMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGVAX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Value Fund Class A (LGVAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGVAX achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than TMMAX's 5.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LGVAX has outperformed TMMAX with an annualized return of 12.07%, while TMMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


LGVAX

1D
0.42%
1M
2.51%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.84%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
12.07%

TMMAX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.81%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.26%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGVAX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGVAX
ClearBridge Value Fund Class A
11.52%10.56%15.04%19.69%-6.33%27.81%11.40%27.04%-12.93%14.59%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
5.01%11.03%17.07%7.32%-3.11%24.10%1.32%24.00%-2.84%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LGVAX and TMMAX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2009

0.81

The correlation between LGVAX and TMMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGVAX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGVAX
LGVAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LGVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LGVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TMMAX
TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGVAX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Value Fund Class A (LGVAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGVAXTMMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.22

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.82

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.32

6.36

+5.96

LGVAX vs. TMMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the TMMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGVAX and TMMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGVAXTMMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.28

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.51

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.57

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.54

+0.14

Drawdowns

LGVAX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGVAX drawdown since its inception was -40.40%, roughly equal to the maximum TMMAX drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGVAX and TMMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGVAXTMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.40%

-41.50%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-5.78%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.09%

-23.00%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

-23.00%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.40%

-33.41%

-6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.35%

+6.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-5.57%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.65%

+0.40%

Volatility

LGVAX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Value Fund Class A (LGVAX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that LGVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGVAXTMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

2.04%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

5.85%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

8.21%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

19.07%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

17.81%

+1.44%

LGVAX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGVAX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TMMAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGVAX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison

LGVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%, less than TMMAX's 24.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGVAX
ClearBridge Value Fund Class A
9.65%10.76%10.83%12.64%8.49%18.44%6.01%0.54%1.86%0.50%0.93%0.39%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
24.09%25.19%23.39%15.23%6.54%4.73%2.15%3.67%4.91%4.10%4.17%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGVAX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGVAX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to TMMAX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGVAX dropped -40.40% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.

LGVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGVAX and TMMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer