LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L
LGUS.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF) and AUCO.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGUS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the L&G US Equity UCITS ETF, while AUCO.L is a Gold fund tracking the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGUS.L returned 12.82%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for AUCO.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGUS.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AUCO.L.
Performance
LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGUS.L achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than AUCO.L's -14.70% return.
LGUS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 21.64%
- 3Y*
- 20.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
AUCO.L
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -14.48%
- 6M
- -23.42%
- YTD
- -14.70%
- 1Y
- 48.05%
- 3Y*
- 41.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF | 10.34% | 17.98% | 25.09% | 28.66% | -20.46% | 27.91% | 21.16% | 30.91% | -9.25% |
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -14.70% | 181.83% | 17.96% | 15.02% | -14.30% | -10.12% | 21.72% | 44.14% | 8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGUS.L and AUCO.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018 | 0.24 |
The correlation between LGUS.L and AUCO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGUS.L
AUCO.L
LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGUS.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.27 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | 2.97 | +7.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum AUCO.L drawdown of -78.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGUS.L and AUCO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGUS.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -78.30% | +44.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.58% | -37.60% | +29.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.46% | -37.60% | +18.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | -48.62% | +22.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -36.38% | +35.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -40.73% | +35.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 16.11% | -13.88% |
Volatility
LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) is 2.86%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that LGUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGUS.L | AUCO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 16.05% | -13.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.41% | 39.39% | -29.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 48.92% | -36.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 38.99% | -22.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 35.75% | -17.65% |
LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGUS.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AUCO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGUS.L nor AUCO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGUS.L and AUCO.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCO.L.
LGUS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while AUCO.L is Gold. LGUS.L tracks L&G US Equity UCITS ETF, while AUCO.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for LGUS.L and 0.55% for AUCO.L.
Find the right allocation for LGUS.L and AUCO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer