LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

LGQM.DE (Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc)) and H410.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - LGQM.DE tracks the SGI Pan Africa Index while H410.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LGQM.DE returned 5.74%/yr vs 9.56%/yr for H410.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGQM.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for H410.DE.

Performance

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGQM.DE achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than H410.DE's 27.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LGQM.DE has underperformed H410.DE with an annualized return of 5.74%, while H410.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.56% annualized return.

LGQM.DE

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: -0.87%
• 6M: 1.37%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 1Y: 34.79%
• 3Y*: 18.21%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 5.74%

H410.DE

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: -1.43%
• 6M: 25.07%
• YTD: 27.90%
• 1Y: 46.45%
• 3Y*: 20.18%
• 5Y*: 8.06%
• 10Y*: 9.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGQM.DE Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc)	1.72%	51.40%	12.14%	-3.16%	-5.95%	9.29%	-6.21%	12.09%	-16.43%	10.99%
H410.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	27.90%	18.65%	13.95%	4.67%	-13.87%	4.04%	6.95%	21.14%	-11.36%	21.12%

Correlation

The correlation between LGQM.DE and H410.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2011	0.61

The correlation between LGQM.DE and H410.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGQM.DE

LGQM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 36
LGQM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
LGQM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
LGQM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
LGQM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
LGQM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 34

H410.DE

H410.DE Risk / Return Rank: 87
H410.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
H410.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
H410.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
H410.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
H410.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGQM.DE	H410.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.37	-1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	3.13	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.42	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	4.42	-2.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	14.54	-10.10

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGQM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the H410.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGQM.DE and H410.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGQM.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than H410.DE's maximum drawdown of -41.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQM.DE and H410.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGQM.DE	H410.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.98%	-41.02%	-20.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.42%	-10.47%	-8.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.42%	-19.01%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.12%	-22.82%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.35%	-31.62%	-18.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.27%	-4.66%	-6.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.95%	-13.32%	-13.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.80%	3.18%	+4.62%

Volatility

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) at 9.07%. This indicates that LGQM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H410.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGQM.DE	H410.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.16%	9.07%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.65%	17.06%	+10.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.05%	19.54%	+12.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.74%	17.09%	+6.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.12%	18.28%	+4.84%

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGQM.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than H410.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGQM.DE vs. H410.DE - Dividend Comparison

LGQM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
H410.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	1.60%	2.00%	2.40%	2.59%	3.11%	2.00%	1.69%	2.03%	2.20%	1.62%	1.71%	2.28%
LGQM.DE Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGQM.DE and H410.DE in my portfolio?

LGQM.DE and H410.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LGQM.DE or H410.DE?

On fees, H410.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGQM.DE or H410.DE?

H410.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGQM.DE.

What is the main difference between LGQM.DE and H410.DE?

LGQM.DE tracks SGI Pan Africa Index, while H410.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGQM.DE and 0.15% for H410.DE.