LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE
LGQM.DE (Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc)) and AXQT.DE (AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - LGQM.DE tracks the SGI Pan Africa Index while AXQT.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LGQM.DE returned 34.79% vs 60.34% for AXQT.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGQM.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AXQT.DE.
Performance
LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGQM.DE achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than AXQT.DE's 39.53% return.
LGQM.DE
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 34.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 5.74%
AXQT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 37.17%
- YTD
- 39.53%
- 1Y
- 60.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LGQM.DE Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.72% | 37.78% |
AXQT.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc | 39.53% | 24.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGQM.DE and AXQT.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LGQM.DE
AXQT.DE
LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGQM.DE | AXQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.50 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 5.28 | -3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 17.84 | -13.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGQM.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than AXQT.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQM.DE and AXQT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGQM.DE | AXQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -12.88% | -49.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -11.49% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.27% | -7.30% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -2.17% | -24.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 3.40% | +4.40% |
Volatility
LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF (Acc) (LGQM.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) at 9.65%. This indicates that LGQM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AXQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGQM.DE | AXQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.16% | 9.65% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.65% | 18.59% | +9.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.05% | 21.11% | +10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 21.60% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 21.60% | +1.52% |
LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGQM.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AXQT.DE's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGQM.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGQM.DE nor AXQT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGQM.DE and AXQT.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AXQT.DE is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AXQT.DE is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LGQM.DE.
LGQM.DE tracks SGI Pan Africa Index, while AXQT.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LGQM.DE and 0.27% for AXQT.DE.
Find the right allocation for LGQM.DE and AXQT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer