LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE
LGQK.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist) and UIMT.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LGQK.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan while UIMT.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LGQK.DE returned 11.66%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for UIMT.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGQK.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for UIMT.DE.
Performance
LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LGQK.DE having a 9.03% return and UIMT.DE slightly lower at 8.82%. Over the past 10 years, LGQK.DE has outperformed UIMT.DE with an annualized return of 11.66%, while UIMT.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.16% annualized return.
LGQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
UIMT.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 13.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 9.03% | 6.49% | 12.16% | 1.67% | -1.07% | 12.33% | 56.18% | 16.88% | -9.04% | 10.27% |
UIMT.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 8.82% | 4.68% | 8.78% | 9.66% | -14.26% | 9.63% | 4.81% | 26.13% | -9.67% | 7.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGQK.DE and UIMT.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2011 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LGQK.DE and UIMT.DE has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LGQK.DE
UIMT.DE
LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGQK.DE | UIMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.55 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.30 | 4.63 | +1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGQK.DE | UIMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.79 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.30 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.39 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.46 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, which is greater than UIMT.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQK.DE and UIMT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGQK.DE | UIMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.96% | -28.10% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -8.46% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.04% | -17.30% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.04% | -19.87% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | -28.10% | -8.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -1.05% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -6.27% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.84% | -0.64% |
Volatility
LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) is 3.20%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMT.DE) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that LGQK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGQK.DE | UIMT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 3.47% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 13.05% | -3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 16.63% | -4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 15.34% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 15.66% | +9.42% |
LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGQK.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UIMT.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGQK.DE vs. UIMT.DE - Dividend Comparison
LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than UIMT.DE's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 2.64% | 2.88% | 5.33% | 3.78% | 4.41% | 3.15% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIMT.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.42% | 1.76% | 1.51% | 1.60% | 1.89% | 1.17% | 1.52% | 1.92% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 2.36% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGQK.DE and UIMT.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UIMT.DE.
LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while UIMT.DE tracks MSCI Pacific SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGQK.DE and 0.28% for UIMT.DE.
Find the right allocation for LGQK.DE and UIMT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer