LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE
LGQK.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist) and AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Amundi - LGQK.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan while AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LGQK.DE returned 11.66%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for AMEA.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGQK.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEA.DE.
Performance
LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGQK.DE achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than AMEA.DE's 31.99% return. Over the past 10 years, LGQK.DE has outperformed AMEA.DE with an annualized return of 11.66%, while AMEA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.07% annualized return.
LGQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 32.57%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 9.03% | 6.49% | 12.16% | 1.67% | -1.07% | 12.33% | 56.18% | 16.88% | -9.04% | 10.27% |
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -15.34% | 1.62% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGQK.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011 | 0.65 |
The correlation between LGQK.DE and AMEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LGQK.DE
AMEA.DE
LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGQK.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.50 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 4.74 | -2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.30 | 17.16 | -10.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGQK.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.85 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.48 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.58 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, which is greater than AMEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGQK.DE and AMEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGQK.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.96% | -34.43% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -11.58% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.04% | -20.48% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.04% | -28.78% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | -33.31% | -3.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -2.69% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -11.52% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 3.21% | -1.01% |
Volatility
LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) is 3.20%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that LGQK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGQK.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 8.10% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 16.15% | -6.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 19.29% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 18.27% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 18.97% | +6.11% |
LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGQK.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGQK.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while AMEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 2.64% | 2.88% | 5.33% | 3.78% | 4.41% | 3.15% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGQK.DE and AMEA.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGQK.DE and 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for LGQK.DE and AMEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer