LGPIX vs. UOPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX).
LGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. UOPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1997.
Performance
LGPIX vs. UOPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LGPIX vs. UOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund | -12.06% | 20.25% | 35.00% | 27.54% | -30.72% | 38.06% | 30.61% | 28.72% | -1.75% | 23.39% |
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund | -18.95% | 30.26% | 41.75% | 115.97% | -60.70% | 48.28% | 86.57% | 80.53% | -9.41% | 68.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGPIX achieves a -12.06% return, which is significantly higher than UOPIX's -18.95% return. Over the past 10 years, LGPIX has underperformed UOPIX with an annualized return of 13.94%, while UOPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.11% annualized return.
LGPIX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -9.18%
- YTD
- -12.06%
- 6M
- -10.28%
- 1Y
- 16.07%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.94%
UOPIX
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -16.01%
- YTD
- -18.95%
- 6M
- -16.55%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 27.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGPIX vs. UOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGPIX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than UOPIX's 1.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LGPIX vs. UOPIX — Risk / Return Rank
LGPIX
UOPIX
LGPIX vs. UOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGPIX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.64 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.88 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 2.94 | +0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGPIX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.64 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.29 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.62 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.09 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between LGPIX and UOPIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LGPIX vs. UOPIX - Dividend Comparison
LGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than UOPIX's 22.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund | 1.71% | 1.51% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.98% | 6.65% | 3.33% | 4.40% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 1.39% | 0.06% |
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund | 22.54% | 18.27% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 5.64% | 11.03% | 9.78% | 5.78% | 6.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LGPIX vs. UOPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGPIX drawdown since its inception was -78.34%, smaller than the maximum UOPIX drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGPIX and UOPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGPIX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.34% | -99.80% | +21.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -24.97% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.34% | -65.01% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.34% | -65.01% | -13.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.86% | -67.57% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -85.01% | +73.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 7.47% | -3.86% |
Volatility
LGPIX vs. UOPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) is 5.67%, while ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that LGPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UOPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LGPIX | UOPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 10.78% | -5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 24.90% | -12.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 45.01% | -22.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 138.97% | 45.05% | +93.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.12% | 44.02% | +55.10% |