LGPIX vs. FSSKX
LGPIX (ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund) and FSSKX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LGPIX returned 1.80%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for FSSKX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGPIX charges 1.59%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FSSKX.
Performance
LGPIX vs. FSSKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGPIX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than FSSKX's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LGPIX has underperformed FSSKX with an annualized return of 1.80%, while FSSKX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return.
LGPIX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- -21.42%
- 5Y*
- -13.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
FSSKX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 34.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
LGPIX vs. FSSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund | 10.35% | 20.25% | -66.25% | 27.54% | -30.72% | 38.06% | 30.61% | 28.72% | -1.75% | 23.39% |
FSSKX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K | 15.12% | 18.98% | 19.89% | 27.04% | -19.47% | 23.28% | 25.01% | 32.33% | -8.52% | 24.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGPIX and FSSKX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008 | 0.94 |
The correlation between LGPIX and FSSKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGPIX vs. FSSKX — Risk / Return Rank
LGPIX
FSSKX
LGPIX vs. FSSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGPIX | FSSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.88 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 18.22 | -10.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGPIX vs. FSSKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGPIX drawdown since its inception was -78.62%, which is greater than FSSKX's maximum drawdown of -53.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGPIX and FSSKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGPIX | FSSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.62% | -53.43% | -25.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -9.20% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.62% | -20.84% | -57.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.62% | -25.20% | -53.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.62% | -34.37% | -44.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.14% | -0.64% | -64.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -7.69% | -4.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 1.95% | +1.70% |
Volatility
LGPIX vs. FSSKX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund (LGPIX) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX) at 5.35%. This indicates that LGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGPIX | FSSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 5.35% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | 11.07% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 13.81% | +3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.08% | 17.91% | +22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.41% | 18.64% | +12.77% |
LGPIX vs. FSSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGPIX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSKX's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGPIX vs. FSSKX - Dividend Comparison
LGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than FSSKX's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSSKX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K | 4.15% | 4.78% | 4.87% | 2.11% | 0.38% | 1.44% | 5.29% | 6.17% | 4.37% | 3.07% | 1.12% | 5.23% |
LGPIX ProFunds Large Cap Growth ProFund | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.98% | 6.65% | 3.33% | 4.40% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 1.39% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, LGPIX and FSSKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LGPIX has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to FSSKX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGPIX dropped -78.62% vs FSSKX's -53.43%.
FSSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGPIX and FSSKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer