LGOV vs. LMBS
LGOV (First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF) and LMBS (First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGOV returned -2.47%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for LMBS. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LGOV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LMBS.
Performance
LGOV vs. LMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGOV achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than LMBS's 1.57% return.
LGOV
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 1Y
- 2.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- -2.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.08%
LMBS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.60M | $4.03M | $4.23M | |
| $23.95M | $27.13M | $25.45M |
LGOV vs. LMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGOV First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF | -1.07% | 9.13% | -2.05% | 4.91% | -19.73% | -1.93% | 11.31% | 11.53% |
LMBS First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 1.57% | 7.05% | 5.15% | 6.10% | -3.07% | -0.91% | 1.64% | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGOV and LMBS is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between LGOV and LMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGOV vs. LMBS — Risk / Return Rank
LGOV
LMBS
LGOV vs. LMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF (LGOV) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGOV | LMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.45 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 3.18 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 12.86 | -12.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGOV vs. LMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGOV drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, which is greater than LMBS's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGOV and LMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGOV | LMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.86% | -6.49% | -24.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.62% | -1.43% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.04% | -1.72% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.10% | -5.99% | -22.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.71% | -0.18% | -15.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.12% | -0.80% | -12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 0.35% | +2.12% |
Volatility
LGOV vs. LMBS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF (LGOV) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) at 0.71%. This indicates that LGOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGOV | LMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 0.71% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.66% | 1.54% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.93% | 1.94% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.05% | 2.58% | +6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 2.35% | +6.85% |
LGOV vs. LMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGOV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LMBS's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGOV vs. LMBS - Dividend Comparison
LGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than LMBS's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGOV First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF | 4.37% | 4.02% | 4.03% | 3.59% | 1.97% | 2.58% | 3.75% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMBS First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.11% | 4.08% | 4.28% | 3.96% | 2.22% | 2.04% | 2.27% | 2.55% | 2.76% | 2.73% | 2.84% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGOV and LMBS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LGOV has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to LMBS (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGOV dropped -30.86% vs LMBS's -6.49%.
On 5-year performance, LMBS leads with 3.13% vs -2.47% for LGOV. On fees, LMBS is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, LMBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LMBS has performed better with a 3.13% return vs -2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LMBS is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LGOV.
LGOV has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 4.11% for LMBS.
Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LGOV and 0.68% for LMBS.
LMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGOV and LMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer