LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LGJG.L (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) and XCX4.L (Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - LGJG.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while XCX4.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Thailand NR THB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGJG.L returned 9.99%/yr vs 5.79%/yr for XCX4.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGJG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCX4.L.

Performance

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGJG.L achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than XCX4.L's 25.44% return.

LGJG.L

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -1.53%
• 6M: 8.23%
• YTD: 14.58%
• 1Y: 33.51%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: —

XCX4.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -3.30%
• 6M: 22.87%
• YTD: 25.44%
• 1Y: 44.53%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 3.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LGJG.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF	14.58%	17.46%	10.01%	13.64%	-6.84%	2.29%	12.68%	14.87%	-27.27%
XCX4.L Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C	25.44%	0.32%	1.51%	-16.15%	15.60%	0.13%	-13.81%	3.68%	-1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LGJG.L and XCX4.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.37

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGJG.L	XCX4.L
Industrials	22.5%	36.9%
Technology	21.7%	-
Financial Services	18.0%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	1.7%
Communication Services	8.3%	12.4%
Healthcare	5.5%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	7.9%
Basic Materials	3.6%	4.2%
Real Estate	2.7%	3.2%
Utilities	1.0%	6.8%
Energy	0.6%	13.6%

Return for Risk

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGJG.L

LGJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LGJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LGJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LGJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
LGJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XCX4.L

XCX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XCX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XCX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XCX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XCX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGJG.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.09	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.85	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	3.90	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.50	11.77	-2.28

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGJG.L and XCX4.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGJG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.21%, smaller than the maximum XCX4.L drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGJG.L and XCX4.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGJG.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.21%	-98.74%	+65.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.04%	-11.35%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.89%	-28.34%	+8.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.89%	-36.52%	+16.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.98%	-6.80%	+1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.80%	-16.24%	+5.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.77%	-0.25%

Volatility

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) is 6.30%, while Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that LGJG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX4.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGJG.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.30%	7.59%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.37%	17.02%	-1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.66%	21.17%	-2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.97%	17.63%	+3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.33%	2,419.36%	-2,398.03%

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGJG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX4.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGJG.L vs. XCX4.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGJG.L nor XCX4.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGJG.L and XCX4.L in my portfolio?

LGJG.L and XCX4.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LGJG.L or XCX4.L?

On fees, LGJG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGJG.L or XCX4.L?

LGJG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCX4.L.

What is the main difference between LGJG.L and XCX4.L?

LGJG.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XCX4.L is Asia Pacific Equities. LGJG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XCX4.L tracks MSCI Thailand NR THB. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGJG.L and 0.50% for XCX4.L.