LGI vs. SAWMX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LGI (Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund) and SAWMX (SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, LGI returned 13.72%/yr vs 8.94%/yr for SAWMX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGI charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SAWMX.

Performance

LGI vs. SAWMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGI achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than SAWMX's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, LGI has outperformed SAWMX with an annualized return of 13.72%, while SAWMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.

LGI

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 22.44%
• 3Y*: 16.20%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: 13.72%

SAWMX

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 9.38%
• 1Y: 21.27%
• 3Y*: 14.28%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: 8.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGI vs. SAWMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	9.32%	21.36%	14.00%	12.89%	-20.57%	25.28%	17.04%	30.25%	-10.51%	39.37%
SAWMX SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund	9.88%	18.15%	6.40%	13.60%	-8.96%	16.67%	4.12%	17.03%	-7.87%	13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between LGI and SAWMX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.68

The correlation between LGI and SAWMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGI vs. SAWMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGI

LGI Risk / Return Rank: 24
LGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
LGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
LGI Omega Ratio Rank: 34
LGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LGI Martin Ratio Rank: 16

SAWMX

SAWMX Risk / Return Rank: 93
SAWMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SAWMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SAWMX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SAWMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SAWMX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGI vs. SAWMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGI	SAWMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	3.22	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	4.68	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.61	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	4.22	-3.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.78	16.70	-12.93

LGI vs. SAWMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SAWMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGI and SAWMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGI vs. SAWMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGI drawdown since its inception was -63.34%, which is greater than SAWMX's maximum drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGI and SAWMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGI	SAWMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.34%	-30.56%	-32.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.25%	-5.79%	-15.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.95%	-11.86%	-10.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.84%	-17.57%	-15.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.94%	-30.56%	-12.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.53%	-1.14%	-4.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.93%	-3.68%	-7.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.96%	1.41%	+4.55%

Volatility

LGI vs. SAWMX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund (SAWMX) at 2.54%. This indicates that LGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAWMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGI	SAWMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	2.54%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.40%	5.87%	+8.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.33%	7.58%	+8.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	9.91%	+9.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.03%	11.04%	+8.99%

LGI vs. SAWMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGI has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SAWMX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGI vs. SAWMX - Dividend Comparison

LGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, more than SAWMX's 5.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund	9.94%	10.08%	9.19%	7.32%	10.22%	9.77%	7.17%	6.44%	19.88%	5.46%	6.94%	8.52%
SAWMX SA Worldwide Moderate Growth Fund	5.42%	5.95%	3.34%	4.20%	8.36%	4.52%	4.88%	5.66%	6.82%	1.28%	1.96%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGI and SAWMX in my portfolio?

LGI and SAWMX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGI or SAWMX?

LGI has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to SAWMX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGI dropped -63.34% vs SAWMX's -30.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAWMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.