LGI vs. CCI
LGI (Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund) is Global Allocation fund managed by Lazard, while CCI (Crown Castle Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, LGI returned 13.72%/yr vs 2.62%/yr for CCI. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LGI vs. CCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGI achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than CCI's -5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LGI has outperformed CCI with an annualized return of 13.72%, while CCI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.62% annualized return.
LGI
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 22.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
CCI
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -9.14%
- YTD
- -5.33%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- -16.57%
- 3Y*
- -4.04%
- 5Y*
- -11.87%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
LGI vs. CCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund | 9.32% | 21.36% | 14.00% | 12.89% | -20.57% | 25.28% | 17.04% | 30.25% | -10.51% | 39.37% |
CCI Crown Castle Inc. | -5.33% | 2.96% | -16.39% | -10.24% | -32.57% | 35.08% | 15.49% | 35.45% | 1.75% | 32.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGI and CCI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2004 | 0.35 |
The correlation between LGI and CCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGI vs. CCI — Risk / Return Rank
LGI
CCI
LGI vs. CCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) and Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGI | CCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.92 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | -0.55 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | -0.91 | +4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGI vs. CCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGI drawdown since its inception was -63.34%, smaller than the maximum CCI drawdown of -97.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGI and CCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGI | CCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.34% | -97.52% | +34.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.25% | -30.01% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.95% | -30.77% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.84% | -55.48% | +22.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.94% | -55.48% | +12.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -50.68% | +45.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.93% | -25.94% | +15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 18.18% | -12.22% |
Volatility
LGI vs. CCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) is 3.84%, while Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that LGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGI | CCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 9.74% | -5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.40% | 23.39% | -8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 27.62% | -11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 26.77% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 26.08% | -6.05% |
Dividends
LGI vs. CCI - Dividend Comparison
LGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, more than CCI's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCI Crown Castle Inc. | 5.17% | 5.35% | 6.90% | 5.43% | 4.41% | 2.62% | 3.10% | 3.22% | 3.94% | 3.51% | 4.15% | 3.87% |
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund | 9.94% | 10.08% | 9.19% | 7.32% | 10.22% | 9.77% | 7.17% | 6.44% | 19.88% | 5.46% | 6.94% | 8.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGI and CCI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCI has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to LGI (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGI dropped -63.34% vs CCI's -97.52%.
LGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGI and CCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer