LGHT vs. SPAQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LGHT (Langar Global HealthTech ETF) and SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LGHT returned -22.28% vs 4.98% for SPAQ. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGHT achieves a -19.52% return, which is significantly lower than SPAQ's 2.81% return.

LGHT

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: -19.52%
• 6M: -20.39%
• 1Y: -22.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPAQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 4.98%
• 3Y*: 5.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF	-19.52%	-1.66%	-0.13%
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF	2.81%	7.35%	4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LGHT and SPAQ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	-0.02

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGHT	SPAQ
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	91.6%
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LGHT vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGHT

LGHT Risk / Return Rank: 1
LGHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
LGHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
LGHT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
LGHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
LGHT Martin Ratio Rank: 0

SPAQ

SPAQ Risk / Return Rank: 20
SPAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SPAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SPAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SPAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SPAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGHT	SPAQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.22	0.57	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	0.84	-2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.13	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	0.94	-1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.04	3.39	-5.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGHT Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the SPAQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGHT and SPAQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGHT	SPAQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.22	0.57	-1.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.50	0.86	-1.36

Drawdowns

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGHT drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGHT and SPAQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGHT	SPAQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-5.30%	-23.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.57%	-5.30%	-20.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.64%	-0.01%	-27.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-0.54%	-7.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.92%	1.47%	+9.45%

Volatility

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison

Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.95%. This indicates that LGHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGHT	SPAQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	1.95%	+4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.88%	5.01%	+8.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.29%	8.80%	+9.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.89%	7.00%	+11.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.89%	7.00%	+11.89%

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LGHT and SPAQ have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

LGHT vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison

LGHT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LGHT Langar Global HealthTech ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF	16.23%	16.69%	3.00%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGHT and SPAQ in my portfolio?

LGHT and SPAQ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGHT or SPAQ?

LGHT has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to SPAQ (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGHT dropped -28.60% vs SPAQ's -5.30%.

Which ETF is better, LGHT or SPAQ?

On 1-year performance, SPAQ leads with 4.98% vs -22.28% for LGHT. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGHT or SPAQ?

Over the 1-year period, SPAQ has performed better with a 4.98% return vs -22.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGHT or SPAQ?

LGHT and SPAQ have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGHT or SPAQ?

SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.23%, compared with 0.00% for LGHT.

What is the main difference between LGHT and SPAQ?

They also come from different issuers: Langar and Horizon.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPAQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.