LGH vs. TEXN
LGH (HCM Defender 500 Index ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LGH tracks the HCM Defender 500 Index while TEXN tracks the Russell Texas Equity Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGH charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.
Performance
LGH vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGH achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 25.94% return.
LGH
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
TEXN
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 25.94%
- 6M
- 24.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGH vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF | 4.82% | 17.26% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 25.94% | 8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGH and TEXN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGH vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank
LGH
TEXN
LGH vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGH | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGH | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 2.75 | -1.95 |
Drawdowns
LGH vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGH drawdown since its inception was -29.60%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGH and TEXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGH | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -6.34% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.24% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -1.12% | -8.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | — | — |
Volatility
LGH vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGH | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.41% | 14.19% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 14.19% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 14.19% | +5.59% |
LGH vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGH has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGH vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison
LGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than TEXN's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGH HCM Defender 500 Index ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.63% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.01% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 1.01% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGH and TEXN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for LGH.
TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.37% for LGH.
LGH tracks HCM Defender 500 Index, while TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for LGH and 0.20% for TEXN.
Find the right allocation for LGH and TEXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer