LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L
LGGL.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and VEVE.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Global Equities funds - LGGL.L tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR while VEVE.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGL.L returned 11.42%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for VEVE.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGGL.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VEVE.L.
Performance
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LGGL.L is traded in USD, while VEVE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEVE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGGL.L achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly lower than VEVE.L's 9.84% return.
LGGL.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- —
VEVE.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 8.05% | 21.18% | 19.20% | 25.02% | -18.03% | 21.94% | 16.35% | 26.98% | -7.73% |
VEVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing | 9.84% | 22.40% | 18.22% | 23.65% | -18.14% | 21.57% | 15.88% | 27.82% | -9.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGL.L and VEVE.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LGGL.L and VEVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Financial Services
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Industrials
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Consumer Cyclical
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Communication Services
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Healthcare
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Consumer Defensive
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Energy
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Basic Materials
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Utilities
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Real Estate
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGGL.L
VEVE.L
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGGL.L | VEVE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.81 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 12.11 | -0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGL.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum VEVE.L drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGL.L and VEVE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGL.L | VEVE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -33.61% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.42% | -8.84% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.79% | -17.24% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.76% | -26.74% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -2.22% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -4.75% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.06% | -0.04% |
Volatility
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGL.L | VEVE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 3.87% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 9.45% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 12.03% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 15.23% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 15.54% | +1.61% |
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGL.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VEVE.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Dividend Comparison
LGGL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEVE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGL.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.71% | 1.98% | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.88% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LGGL.L and VEVE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGGL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VEVE.L.
LGGL.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while VEVE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGL.L and 0.12% for VEVE.L.
Find the right allocation for LGGL.L and VEVE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer