PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGGL.L is traded in USD, while VEVE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEVE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGL.L achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly lower than VEVE.L's 9.84% return.


LGGL.L

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
8.05%
6M
7.84%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*

VEVE.L

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
9.84%
6M
9.75%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGGL.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
8.05%21.18%19.20%25.02%-18.03%21.94%16.35%26.98%-7.73%
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
9.84%22.40%18.22%23.65%-18.14%21.57%15.88%27.82%-9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGL.L and VEVE.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.92

The correlation between LGGL.L and VEVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGGL.L
VEVE.L

Technology

31.5%
29.0%

Financial Services

15.2%
15.6%

Industrials

10.5%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.3%

Communication Services

9.2%
9.0%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.1%

Energy

3.6%
4.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.4%

Utilities

2.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.0%

Technology

LGGL.L
31.5%
VEVE.L
29.0%

Financial Services

LGGL.L
15.2%
VEVE.L
15.6%

Industrials

LGGL.L
10.5%
VEVE.L
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

LGGL.L
9.4%
VEVE.L
9.3%

Communication Services

LGGL.L
9.2%
VEVE.L
9.0%

Healthcare

LGGL.L
8.6%
VEVE.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

LGGL.L
4.9%
VEVE.L
5.1%

Energy

LGGL.L
3.6%
VEVE.L
4.1%

Basic Materials

LGGL.L
3.2%
VEVE.L
3.4%

Utilities

LGGL.L
2.3%
VEVE.L
2.6%

Real Estate

LGGL.L
1.7%
VEVE.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGL.L
LGGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VEVE.L
VEVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LGGL.LVEVE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.81

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

12.11

-0.96

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the VEVE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGL.L and VEVE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGL.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum VEVE.L drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGL.L and VEVE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGL.LVEVE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-33.61%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-8.84%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-17.24%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.76%

-26.74%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-2.22%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-4.75%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.06%

-0.04%

Volatility

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGGL.LVEVE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.87%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

9.45%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

12.03%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

15.23%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

15.54%

+1.61%

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGL.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VEVE.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGGL.L vs. VEVE.L - Dividend Comparison

LGGL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEVE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGGL.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.26%1.38%1.48%1.71%1.98%1.46%1.62%1.95%2.24%1.93%1.88%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LGGL.L and VEVE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LGGL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VEVE.L.

LGGL.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while VEVE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGL.L and 0.12% for VEVE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGL.L and VEVE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer