LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L
LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and VHYG.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - LGGG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while VHYG.L tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGG.L returned 13.23%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for VHYG.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYG.L.
Performance
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LGGG.L is traded in GBp, while VHYG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHYG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGGG.L achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than VHYG.L's 11.62% return.
LGGG.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- —
VHYG.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- —
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.12% | 12.92% | 21.13% | 18.08% | -8.24% | 23.53% | 12.41% | 1.71% |
VHYG.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF | 11.62% | 18.36% | 10.99% | 5.01% | 6.20% | 19.28% | -3.61% | -18.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGG.L and VHYG.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between LGGG.L and VHYG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Financial Services
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Industrials
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Communication Services
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Consumer Cyclical
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Healthcare
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Consumer Defensive
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Energy
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Basic Materials
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Utilities
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Real Estate
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGGG.L
VHYG.L
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGG.L | VHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.58 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 4.10 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 14.82 | +1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGG.L | VHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 3.10 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 1.05 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.42 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum VHYG.L drawdown of -39.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and VHYG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGG.L | VHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -39.81% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -6.93% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.68% | -12.76% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -12.76% | -5.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -8.23% | +5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.92% | -0.24% |
Volatility
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) at 2.27%. This indicates that LGGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGG.L | VHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 2.27% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 7.12% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 9.16% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 11.12% | +2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 15.91% | -0.82% |
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYG.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGGG.L vs. VHYG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGGG.L nor VHYG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGGG.L and VHYG.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYG.L.
LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VHYG.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.29% for VHYG.L.
Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and VHYG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer