LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L
LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and V3AB.L (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Legal & General and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGG.L returned 13.23%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for V3AB.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for V3AB.L.
Performance
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LGGG.L is traded in GBp, while V3AB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the V3AB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGGG.L achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than V3AB.L's 12.14% return.
LGGG.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- —
V3AB.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 12.14%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.12% | 12.92% | 21.13% | 18.08% | -8.24% | 19.94% |
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 12.14% | 12.22% | 19.77% | 17.95% | -11.67% | 17.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGG.L and V3AB.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.96 |
The correlation between LGGG.L and V3AB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Financial Services
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Industrials
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Communication Services
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Consumer Cyclical
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Healthcare
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Consumer Defensive
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Energy
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Basic Materials
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Utilities
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Real Estate
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGGG.L
V3AB.L
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGG.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.49 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.76 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 15.42 | +0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGG.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.58 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.87 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, which is greater than V3AB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and V3AB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGG.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -19.00% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -8.00% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.68% | -19.00% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -19.00% | +0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.55% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -4.22% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.96% | -0.28% |
Volatility
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3AB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGG.L | V3AB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 3.38% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 8.82% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 11.66% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 13.72% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 13.67% | +1.42% |
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than V3AB.L's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGGG.L vs. V3AB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGGG.L nor V3AB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, LGGG.L and V3AB.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3AB.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.24% for V3AB.L.
Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and V3AB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer