PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and MIDD.L (iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGGG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while MIDD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGG.L returned 13.23%/yr vs 3.14%/yr for MIDD.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MIDD.L.

Performance

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGGG.L achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly higher than MIDD.L's 5.26% return.

LGGG.L

1D
0.07%
1M
5.28%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.38%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
—

MIDD.L

1D
0.56%
1M
4.32%
YTD
5.26%
6M
7.17%
1Y
13.79%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF		10.12%12.92%21.13%18.08%-8.24%23.53%12.41%22.99%-4.89%
MIDD.L
iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF		5.26%12.44%7.33%7.76%-17.86%16.27%-5.34%28.46%-8.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGG.L and MIDD.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018

0.63

The correlation between LGGG.L and MIDD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LGGG.L
MIDD.L

Technology

28.4%
9.2%

Financial Services

15.9%
19.5%

Industrials

10.9%
19.9%

Communication Services

9.7%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
13.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
6.1%

Energy

4.0%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.6%

Utilities

2.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
9.4%

Technology

LGGG.L
28.4%
MIDD.L
9.2%

Financial Services

LGGG.L
15.9%
MIDD.L
19.5%

Industrials

LGGG.L
10.9%
MIDD.L
19.9%

Communication Services

LGGG.L
9.7%
MIDD.L
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LGGG.L
9.4%
MIDD.L
13.3%

Healthcare

LGGG.L
8.8%
MIDD.L
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

LGGG.L
5.3%
MIDD.L
6.1%

Energy

LGGG.L
4.0%
MIDD.L
2.5%

Basic Materials

LGGG.L
3.2%
MIDD.L
6.6%

Utilities

LGGG.L
2.5%
MIDD.L
3.0%

Real Estate

LGGG.L
1.8%
MIDD.L
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF

iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF

Often compared with LGGG.L:
LGGG.L vs. VWRP.LLGGG.L vs. SWLD.LLGGG.L vs. VEVE.LLGGG.L vs. LCWL.LLGGG.L vs. SWDA.LLGGG.L vs. FUQIXLGGG.L vs. VFEM.L
Often compared with MIDD.L:
MIDD.L vs. VMID.LMIDD.L vs. CSUK.LMIDD.L vs. CUKS.LMIDD.L vs. ISF.LMIDD.L vs. HMWO.LMIDD.L vs. SWDA.LMIDD.L vs. FTAL.L

Return for Risk

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LGGG.L
LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
MIDD.L
MIDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MIDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LGGG.LMIDD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.67
1.10

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.69
1.67

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.21

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

1.19

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.19

4.19

+12.00

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the MIDD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGG.L and MIDD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LGGG.LMIDD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.10

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.21

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.33

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.48

+0.43

Drawdowns

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum MIDD.L drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and MIDD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LGGG.LMIDD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.38%

-51.66%

+26.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-11.54%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.68%

-16.92%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-29.93%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-41.60%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.77%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-8.76%

+5.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

3.28%

-1.60%

Volatility

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LGGG.LMIDD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

3.92%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

10.27%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

12.49%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

15.27%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

16.54%

-1.45%

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGGG.L vs. MIDD.L - Dividend Comparison

LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MIDD.L
iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF		3.43%3.56%3.05%3.17%2.76%2.01%1.51%2.72%3.07%2.80%2.67%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

LGGG.L and MIDD.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MIDD.L.

LGGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while MIDD.L is Europe Equities. LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while MIDD.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.40% for MIDD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and MIDD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer