LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L
LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGGG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while LDEG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGG.L returned 13.23%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for LDEG.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDEG.L.
Performance
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGGG.L having a 10.12% return and LDEG.L slightly higher at 10.41%.
LGGG.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- —
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.12% | 12.92% | 21.13% | 18.08% | -8.24% | 13.20% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.41% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGG.L and LDEG.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between LGGG.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Financial Services
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Industrials
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Communication Services
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Cyclical
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Healthcare
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Defensive
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Energy
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Basic Materials
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Utilities
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
Real Estate
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGGG.L
LDEG.L
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGG.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.48 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.78 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 13.82 | +2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGG.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.63 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 1.24 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.24 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and LDEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGG.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -15.97% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -8.04% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.68% | -12.05% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -15.97% | -2.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -1.33% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -2.95% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.20% | -0.52% |
Volatility
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGG.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 3.57% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 9.21% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 11.55% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 15.99% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 16.01% | -0.92% |
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison
LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGGG.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.
LGGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while LDEG.L is Europe Equities. LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.
Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and LDEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer