PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LGGG.L having a 10.12% return and LDEG.L slightly higher at 10.41%.


LGGG.L

1D
0.07%
1M
5.28%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.38%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*

LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.38%
YTD
10.41%
6M
13.94%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
10.12%12.92%21.13%18.08%-8.24%13.20%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LGGG.L and LDEG.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.49

The correlation between LGGG.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGGG.L
LDEG.L

Technology

28.4%
2.0%

Financial Services

15.9%
41.5%

Industrials

10.9%
15.8%

Communication Services

9.7%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
3.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
3.1%

Energy

4.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
9.9%

Utilities

2.5%
8.2%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

LGGG.L
28.4%
LDEG.L
2.0%

Financial Services

LGGG.L
15.9%
LDEG.L
41.5%

Industrials

LGGG.L
10.9%
LDEG.L
15.8%

Communication Services

LGGG.L
9.7%
LDEG.L
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LGGG.L
9.4%
LDEG.L
3.3%

Healthcare

LGGG.L
8.8%
LDEG.L
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

LGGG.L
5.3%
LDEG.L
3.1%

Energy

LGGG.L
4.0%
LDEG.L
7.7%

Basic Materials

LGGG.L
3.2%
LDEG.L
9.9%

Utilities

LGGG.L
2.5%
LDEG.L
8.2%

Real Estate

LGGG.L
1.8%
LDEG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGGG.L
LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGGG.LLDEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.48

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.78

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.19

13.82

+2.36

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGGG.L and LDEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGGG.LLDEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.63

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

1.24

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.24

-0.33

Drawdowns

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and LDEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGGG.LLDEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.38%

-15.97%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-8.04%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.68%

-12.05%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-15.97%

-2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.33%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-2.95%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.20%

-0.52%

Volatility

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGGG.LLDEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

3.57%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

9.21%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

11.55%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

15.99%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

16.01%

-0.92%

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGGG.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison

LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGGG.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

LGGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while LDEG.L is Europe Equities. LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and LDEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer