LGGG.L vs. INFR.L
LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - LGGG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGGG.L returned 13.23%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for INFR.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.
Performance
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGGG.L achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 9.52% return.
LGGG.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- —
INFR.L
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 16.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.12% | 12.92% | 21.13% | 18.08% | -8.24% | 23.53% | 12.41% | 22.99% | -4.89% |
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.52% | 5.90% | 11.49% | -4.96% | 5.77% | 19.54% | -4.70% | 20.82% | -1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGGG.L and INFR.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LGGG.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGGG.L
INFR.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
LGGG.L
INFR.L
Financial Services
LGGG.L
INFR.L
Industrials
LGGG.L
INFR.L
Communication Services
LGGG.L
INFR.L
Consumer Cyclical
LGGG.L
INFR.L
-
Healthcare
LGGG.L
INFR.L
-
Consumer Defensive
LGGG.L
INFR.L
-
Energy
LGGG.L
INFR.L
Basic Materials
LGGG.L
INFR.L
-
Utilities
LGGG.L
INFR.L
Real Estate
LGGG.L
INFR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGGG.L
INFR.L
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGGG.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.27 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.13 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 7.96 | +8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGGG.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 1.55 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.62 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.52 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGGG.L and INFR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGGG.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -34.25% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -5.19% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.68% | -11.08% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -22.87% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -3.70% | +3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -6.12% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.04% | -0.36% |
Volatility
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) is 2.47%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that LGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGGG.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 3.92% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 8.92% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 10.49% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 12.26% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 14.10% | +0.99% |
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGGG.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison
LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 3.02% | 2.54% | 2.60% | 2.84% | 2.70% | 2.99% | 3.51% | 3.45% | 4.75% |
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGGG.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.
LGGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGGG.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.
Find the right allocation for LGGG.L and INFR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer