PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGEU.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGEU.L is traded in EUR, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGEU.L achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 19.75% return.


LGEU.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.36%
6M
6.63%
YTD
10.65%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*

CMU.L

1D
0.27%
1M
0.48%
6M
16.56%
YTD
19.75%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LGEU.L
L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF
10.65%19.94%6.68%17.97%-11.77%24.90%1.53%30.71%-9.44%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
19.75%19.15%6.31%16.82%-10.18%20.38%-1.09%26.62%-8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LGEU.L and CMU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.90

The correlation between LGEU.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGEU.L
LGEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LGEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LGEU.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.77

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.15

10.68

-2.54

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGEU.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGEU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.27%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -38.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGEU.L and CMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGEU.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.27%

-38.75%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.61%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-14.04%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.68%

-23.95%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-1.70%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-6.76%

+1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.76%

-0.16%

Volatility

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGEU.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.67%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

12.71%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

15.08%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

16.05%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

16.82%

+0.17%

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGEU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGEU.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGEU.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LGEU.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGEU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGEU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.

LGEU.L tracks L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGEU.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGEU.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer