PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEG.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LGEG.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


LGEG.L

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.85%
YTD
6.43%
6M
8.85%
1Y
19.40%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*

MMS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LGEG.L
L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF
6.43%26.07%-0.86%
MMS.L
Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGEG.L
MMS.L

Financial Services

23.9%
16.9%

Industrials

20.9%
21.8%

Healthcare

13.8%
7.7%

Technology

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
1.7%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.9%

Utilities

4.4%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.0%

Energy

2.8%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.6%
12.8%

Financial Services

LGEG.L
23.9%
MMS.L
16.9%

Industrials

LGEG.L
20.9%
MMS.L
21.8%

Healthcare

LGEG.L
13.8%
MMS.L
7.7%

Technology

LGEG.L
10.9%
MMS.L
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LGEG.L
7.9%
MMS.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

LGEG.L
6.7%
MMS.L
1.7%

Basic Materials

LGEG.L
5.0%
MMS.L
5.9%

Utilities

LGEG.L
4.4%
MMS.L
3.4%

Communication Services

LGEG.L
3.2%
MMS.L
3.0%

Energy

LGEG.L
2.8%
MMS.L
5.6%

Real Estate

LGEG.L
0.6%
MMS.L
12.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGEG.L
LGEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LGEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LGEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MMS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEG.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGEG.LMMS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGEG.LMMS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

Drawdowns

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGEG.LMMS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

Volatility

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGEG.LMMS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGEG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGEG.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, LGEG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGEG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.

LGEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGEG.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGEG.L and MMS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer