LGEG.L vs. MMS.L
LGEG.L (L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - LGEG.L tracks the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. LGEG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LGEG.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
LGEG.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- —
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LGEG.L L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF | 6.43% | 26.07% | -0.86% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Industrials
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Healthcare
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Technology
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Consumer Defensive
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Basic Materials
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Utilities
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Communication Services
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Energy
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Real Estate
LGEG.L
MMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGEG.L
MMS.L
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEG.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGEG.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGEG.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGEG.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | — | — |
Volatility
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGEG.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | — | — |
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGEG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGEG.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGEG.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LGEG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGEG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
LGEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGEG.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for LGEG.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer