PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGCF vs. VGUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGCF vs. VGUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGCF achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly higher than VGUS's 1.48% return.


LGCF

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.95%
YTD
4.45%
6M
5.09%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGUS

1D
0.03%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGCF vs. VGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LGCF and VGUS is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGCF vs. VGUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGCF
LGCF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LGCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LGCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGCF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VGUS
VGUS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGCF vs. VGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGCFVGUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-33.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

10.91

-9.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

54.56

-51.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

414.19

-404.65

LGCF vs. VGUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the VGUS Sharpe Ratio of 12.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGCF and VGUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGCFVGUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

12.14

-10.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

11.78

-10.69

Drawdowns

LGCF vs. VGUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGCF drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than VGUS's maximum drawdown of -0.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGCF and VGUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGCFVGUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-0.07%

-16.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-0.07%

-5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-0.00%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.01%

+1.89%

Volatility

LGCF vs. VGUS - Volatility Comparison

Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS) at 0.11%. This indicates that LGCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGCFVGUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

0.11%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

0.18%

+9.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

0.33%

+12.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

0.34%

+14.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

0.34%

+14.82%

LGCF vs. VGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VGUS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGCF vs. VGUS - Dividend Comparison

LGCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than VGUS's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LGCF
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF
1.76%1.84%1.19%
VGUS
Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF
3.61%3.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGCF and VGUS have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGCF has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to VGUS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGCF dropped -16.67% vs VGUS's -0.07%.

On 1-year performance, LGCF leads with 18.10% vs 3.95% for VGUS. On fees, VGUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VGUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LGCF has performed better with a 18.10% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LGCF.

VGUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.76% for LGCF.

LGCF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VGUS is Ultrashort Bond. LGCF tracks Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index, while VGUS tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LGCF and 0.07% for VGUS.

VGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.14 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGCF and VGUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer