LGCF vs. PRXV
LGCF (Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. LGCF is passively managed, while PRXV is actively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LGCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.
Performance
LGCF vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LGCF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.94%
PRXV
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.08K | $4.14K | $25.50K | |
| $979.94K | $510.04K | $263.55K |
LGCF vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF | 7.36% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 8.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGCF and PRXV is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGCF vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank
LGCF
PRXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LGCF vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGCF | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGCF vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGCF drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGCF and PRXV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGCF | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -1.41% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.24% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -0.39% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | — | — |
Volatility
LGCF vs. PRXV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGCF | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 10.08% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 10.08% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 10.08% | +4.81% |
LGCF vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGCF vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison
LGCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than PRXV's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF | 1.67% | 1.84% | 1.19% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGCF and PRXV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.
LGCF has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.38% for PRXV.
They also come from different issuers: Themes and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LGCF and 0.36% for PRXV.
Find the right allocation for LGCF and PRXV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer