LGCF vs. DIVZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LGCF (Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. LGCF is passively managed, while DIVZ is actively managed. Over the past year, LGCF returned 21.52% vs 11.27% for DIVZ. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LGCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.

Performance

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGCF achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 7.08% return.

LGCF

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.97%
• 6M: 8.45%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 1Y: 21.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.94%

DIVZ

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: 3.13%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 1Y: 11.27%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: 9.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	$843.62K	$1.68M	$1.36M
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF	$3.08K	$4.14K	$25.50K

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF	9.78%	15.71%	17.65%	3.29%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	7.08%	16.72%	18.44%	3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LGCF and DIVZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023	0.70

The correlation between LGCF and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LGCF	DIVZ
Financial Services	38.3%	9.0%
Energy	19.0%	14.7%
Healthcare	17.9%	19.7%
Technology	8.5%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	20.1%
Communication Services	2.1%	5.4%
Basic Materials	1.9%	5.7%
Industrials	1.5%	10.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	13.6%

Return for Risk

LGCF vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LGCF

LGCF Risk / Return Rank: 76
LGCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LGCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
LGCF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LGCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LGCF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 46
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGCF	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.14	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	1.71	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.20	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	1.95	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	4.50	+6.65

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGCF and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGCF drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGCF and DIVZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGCF	DIVZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	-15.42%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	-5.83%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-2.48%	+1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-3.44%	+1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	2.52%	-0.70%

Volatility

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is 2.55%, while Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that LGCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGCF	DIVZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	3.87%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.96%	7.84%	+2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.59%	10.00%	+2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.89%	12.66%	+2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.89%	12.56%	+2.33%

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGCF vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

LGCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than DIVZ's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.47%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%
LGCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF	1.67%	1.84%	1.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGCF and DIVZ in my portfolio?

LGCF and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGCF or DIVZ?

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to LGCF (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGCF dropped -16.67% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

Which ETF is better, LGCF or DIVZ?

On 1-year performance, LGCF leads with 21.52% vs 11.27% for DIVZ. On fees, LGCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, LGCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LGCF or DIVZ?

Over the 1-year period, LGCF has performed better with a 21.52% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGCF or DIVZ?

LGCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LGCF or DIVZ?

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.67% for LGCF.

What is the main difference between LGCF and DIVZ?

They also come from different issuers: Themes and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LGCF and 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LGCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.