LGAP.L vs. JREA.L
LGAP.L (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JREA.L (JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. LGAP.L is passively managed, while JREA.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LGAP.L returned 11.89%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for JREA.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGAP.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JREA.L.
Performance
LGAP.L vs. JREA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGAP.L achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than JREA.L's 19.52% return.
LGAP.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- —
JREA.L
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -8.72%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 1Y
- 33.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGAP.L vs. JREA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGAP.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.67% | 20.97% | 4.67% | 4.82% | -7.79% |
JREA.L JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.52% | 29.63% | 8.81% | 4.45% | -11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGAP.L and JREA.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between LGAP.L and JREA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGAP.L vs. JREA.L — Risk / Return Rank
LGAP.L
JREA.L
LGAP.L vs. JREA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGAP.L) and JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JREA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LGAP.L | JREA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.29 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 2.85 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 8.70 | -4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LGAP.L vs. JREA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGAP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, which is greater than JREA.L's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGAP.L and JREA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGAP.L | JREA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.56% | -28.16% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -11.77% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -18.58% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -10.61% | +7.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -8.39% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.86% | -0.65% |
Volatility
LGAP.L vs. JREA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGAP.L) is 3.28%, while JPM AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JREA.L) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that LGAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JREA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGAP.L | JREA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 8.95% | -5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 19.13% | -7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | 21.30% | -7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 19.60% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 19.60% | -0.34% |
LGAP.L vs. JREA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGAP.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JREA.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGAP.L vs. JREA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LGAP.L nor JREA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LGAP.L and JREA.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGAP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGAP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JREA.L.
They also come from different issuers: L&G and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LGAP.L and 0.30% for JREA.L.
Find the right allocation for LGAP.L and JREA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer