LFSC vs. BTEC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFSC (F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. LFSC is actively managed, while BTEC is passively managed. LFSC charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.

Performance

LFSC vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LFSC

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 1.68%
• 1Y: 58.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTEC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFSC vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF	7.60%
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

LFSC vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFSC

LFSC Risk / Return Rank: 67
LFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFSC vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFSC	BTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFSC	BTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	—	—

Drawdowns

LFSC vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFSC drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFSC and BTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFSC	BTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.74%	0.00%	-29.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	0.00%	-3.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	0.00%	-7.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LFSC	BTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.01%	0.00%	+26.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.90%	0.00%	+28.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.90%	0.00%	+28.90%

LFSC vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFSC has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFSC vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LFSC nor BTEC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, LFSC or BTEC?

On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFSC or BTEC?

BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for LFSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFSC or BTEC?

LFSC and BTEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LFSC and BTEC?

They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for LFSC and 0.42% for BTEC.