PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFRIX vs. LLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFRIX vs. LLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFRIX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than LLDYX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LFRIX has outperformed LLDYX with an annualized return of 4.48%, while LLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.


LFRIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.12%
6M
2.38%
YTD
2.45%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
4.13%

LLDYX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.26%
6M
0.51%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
5.06%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.65%
ALL TIME*
2.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LFRIX vs. LLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
2.45%6.30%8.28%12.22%-2.99%5.48%-1.47%7.59%-0.01%3.97%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.93%6.19%5.13%5.41%-5.35%1.07%3.17%5.64%1.47%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LFRIX and LLDYX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2007

0.28

The correlation between LFRIX and LLDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFRIX vs. LLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFRIX
LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LLDYX
LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFRIX vs. LLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFRIXLLDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.63

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

3.22

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

11.99

+2.03

LFRIX vs. LLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the LLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFRIX and LLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFRIX vs. LLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFRIX drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, which is greater than LLDYX's maximum drawdown of -10.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFRIX and LLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFRIXLLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.90%

-10.54%

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.55%

-1.29%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.59%

-1.29%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.23%

-7.43%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.75%

-9.67%

-12.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.26%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-1.19%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.34%

+0.08%

Volatility

LFRIX vs. LLDYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) is 0.31%, while Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) has a volatility of 0.54%. This indicates that LFRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFRIXLLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

0.54%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

1.71%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

2.35%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.87%

2.76%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.91%

2.59%

+1.32%

LFRIX vs. LLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFRIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LLDYX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFRIX vs. LLDYX - Dividend Comparison

LFRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than LLDYX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
6.24%7.20%7.68%7.63%3.95%4.01%4.64%5.71%5.60%4.65%4.64%4.72%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
4.67%5.21%4.73%4.71%2.58%2.52%3.06%3.79%4.11%3.90%4.15%4.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFRIX and LLDYX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLDYX has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to LFRIX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFRIX dropped -27.90% vs LLDYX's -10.54%.

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFRIX and LLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer