LFRIX vs. LALDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFRIX (Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund) and LALDX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) are both mutual funds - LFRIX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LALDX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, LFRIX returned 4.58%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for LALDX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LFRIX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for LALDX.

Performance

LFRIX vs. LALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFRIX achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly higher than LALDX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LFRIX has outperformed LALDX with an annualized return of 4.58%, while LALDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.

LFRIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.62%
• 1Y: 6.46%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: 4.58%

LALDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 2.03%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFRIX vs. LALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund	1.91%	6.30%	8.28%	12.22%	-2.99%	5.48%	-1.47%	7.59%	-0.01%	3.97%
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	0.96%	5.70%	4.48%	4.76%	-5.48%	1.17%	2.98%	5.42%	1.24%	2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LFRIX and LALDX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007	0.29

Return for Risk

LFRIX vs. LALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFRIX

LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

LALDX

LALDX Risk / Return Rank: 67
LALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
LALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
LALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFRIX vs. LALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFRIX	LALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	1.84	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.22	3.14	+3.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.10	1.57	+0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.18	3.51	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.86	14.56	+1.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFRIX vs. LALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the LALDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFRIX and LALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFRIX	LALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	1.84	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.92	0.75	+1.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.17	0.95	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	1.29	-0.17

Drawdowns

LFRIX vs. LALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFRIX drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, which is greater than LALDX's maximum drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFRIX and LALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFRIX	LALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.90%	-10.58%	-17.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.55%	-1.29%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.59%	-1.29%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.23%	-7.60%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.75%	-9.67%	-12.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-0.82%	-1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	0.31%	+0.10%

Volatility

LFRIX vs. LALDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) is 0.64%, while Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) has a volatility of 0.81%. This indicates that LFRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFRIX	LALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	0.81%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.86%	1.91%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42%	2.45%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.86%	2.70%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.91%	2.61%	+1.30%

LFRIX vs. LALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFRIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LALDX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFRIX vs. LALDX - Dividend Comparison

LFRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, more than LALDX's 4.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	4.95%	5.01%	4.11%	4.09%	2.42%	2.37%	2.88%	3.59%	3.88%	3.71%	3.95%	3.95%
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund	6.89%	7.20%	7.68%	7.63%	3.95%	4.01%	4.64%	5.71%	5.60%	4.65%	4.64%	4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFRIX and LALDX in my portfolio?

LFRIX and LALDX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFRIX or LALDX?

LALDX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to LFRIX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFRIX dropped -27.90% vs LALDX's -10.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.