PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFRIX vs. FFRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFRIX vs. FFRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFRIX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than FFRSX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, LFRIX has outperformed FFRSX with an annualized return of 4.48%, while FFRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.


LFRIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.12%
6M
2.38%
YTD
2.45%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
4.13%

FFRSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
6M
1.25%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
3.29%
ALL TIME*
3.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LFRIX vs. FFRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
2.45%6.30%8.28%12.22%-2.99%5.48%-1.47%7.59%-0.01%3.97%
FFRSX
Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund
1.23%5.61%6.71%8.04%-5.85%3.73%0.45%6.71%0.38%3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between LFRIX and FFRSX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2010

0.61

The correlation between LFRIX and FFRSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFRIX vs. FFRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFRIX
LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRSX
FFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFRIX vs. FFRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) and Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFRIXFFRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.81

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

4.01

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

13.76

+0.26

LFRIX vs. FFRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FFRSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFRIX and FFRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFRIX vs. FFRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFRIX drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, which is greater than FFRSX's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFRIX and FFRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFRIXFFRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.90%

-17.13%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.55%

-1.07%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.59%

-1.45%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.23%

-7.54%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.75%

-17.13%

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.12%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-0.90%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.31%

+0.11%

Volatility

LFRIX vs. FFRSX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) has a higher volatility of 0.31% compared to Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) at 0.21%. This indicates that LFRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFRIXFFRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

0.21%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

1.44%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

2.06%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.87%

2.44%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.91%

3.24%

+0.67%

LFRIX vs. FFRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFRIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFRIX vs. FFRSX - Dividend Comparison

LFRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than FFRSX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRSX
Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund
5.22%6.38%6.95%6.88%4.15%2.92%3.37%4.62%4.41%3.68%3.76%3.71%
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
6.24%7.20%7.68%7.63%3.95%4.01%4.64%5.71%5.60%4.65%4.64%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFRIX and FFRSX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFRIX has higher volatility (0.31%) compared to FFRSX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFRIX dropped -27.90% vs FFRSX's -17.13%.

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFRIX and FFRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer