PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSYAX vs. TMAYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSYAX vs. TMAYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) and Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSYAX achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than TMAYX's 1.54% return.


LSYAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.90%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*

TMAYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
8.41%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSYAX vs. TMAYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LSYAX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
2.37%7.50%8.46%10.60%-7.21%4.50%14.22%
TMAYX
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y
1.54%6.15%8.27%13.25%-8.54%9.47%21.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LSYAX and TMAYX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.78

The correlation between LSYAX and TMAYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSYAX vs. TMAYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSYAX
LSYAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LSYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LSYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TMAYX
TMAYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TMAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSYAX vs. TMAYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) and Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSYAXTMAYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

2.37

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.66

3.78

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.48

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.01

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.25

12.67

+3.58

LSYAX vs. TMAYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSYAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the TMAYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSYAX and TMAYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSYAXTMAYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.37

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

1.01

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.86

+0.67

Drawdowns

LSYAX vs. TMAYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSYAX drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum TMAYX drawdown of -21.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSYAX and TMAYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSYAXTMAYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-21.44%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-2.02%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.30%

-4.36%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.79%

-13.66%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-2.10%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.48%

+0.10%

Volatility

LSYAX vs. TMAYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) at 0.76%. This indicates that LSYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMAYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSYAXTMAYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.76%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

2.05%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

2.59%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

4.70%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

5.06%

-0.86%

LSYAX vs. TMAYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSYAX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAYX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSYAX vs. TMAYX - Dividend Comparison

LSYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than TMAYX's 7.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSYAX
Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund
7.86%7.91%8.01%6.38%4.86%5.77%4.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMAYX
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y
7.73%7.25%7.82%7.91%6.25%6.37%6.43%3.81%2.18%4.47%2.86%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSYAX and TMAYX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSYAX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to TMAYX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSYAX dropped -10.79% vs TMAYX's -21.44%.

LSYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSYAX and TMAYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer