PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFGY vs. QYLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LFGY vs. QYLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LFGY vs. QYLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


LFGY

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.25%
YTD
-7.99%
6M
-24.51%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LFGY vs. QYLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE's 0.61% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LFGY vs. QYLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. QYLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFGYQYLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.72

LFGY vs. QYLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFGYQYLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

Dividends

LFGY vs. QYLE - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 106.59%, while QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

LFGY vs. QYLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than QYLE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and QYLE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LFGYQYLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

0.00%

-35.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.72%

0.00%

-29.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

0.00%

-14.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.17%

Volatility

LFGY vs. QYLE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LFGYQYLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.15%

0.00%

+40.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.68%

0.00%

+42.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.68%

0.00%

+42.68%