PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFEDX vs. MITTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFEDX vs. MITTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund (LFEDX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFEDX achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than MITTX's 7.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LFEDX has underperformed MITTX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while MITTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.94% annualized return.


LFEDX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.35%
YTD
6.62%
6M
6.10%
1Y
14.30%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
9.89%

MITTX

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.11%
YTD
7.06%
6M
6.20%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFEDX vs. MITTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFEDX
MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund
6.62%13.17%10.54%14.88%-14.86%17.24%12.82%25.16%-7.02%19.50%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
7.06%13.67%19.69%19.26%-16.27%26.73%18.72%31.92%-5.56%23.55%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEDX and MITTX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.93

The correlation between LFEDX and MITTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFEDX vs. MITTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFEDX
LFEDX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LFEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LFEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MITTX
MITTX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MITTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MITTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFEDX vs. MITTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund (LFEDX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFEDXMITTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.02

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

8.67

+2.05

LFEDX vs. MITTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFEDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the MITTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFEDX and MITTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFEDX vs. MITTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEDX drawdown since its inception was -30.30%, smaller than the maximum MITTX drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEDX and MITTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFEDXMITTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.30%

-49.54%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

-9.76%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.79%

-16.10%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-23.27%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.30%

-33.45%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-1.04%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-10.53%

+6.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.27%

-0.88%

Volatility

LFEDX vs. MITTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund (LFEDX) is 2.63%, while MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that LFEDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MITTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFEDXMITTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

4.29%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

9.31%

-3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.54%

11.75%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.90%

15.77%

-4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.58%

17.25%

-4.67%

LFEDX vs. MITTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MITTX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFEDX vs. MITTX - Dividend Comparison

LFEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, less than MITTX's 13.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFEDX
MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund
7.49%7.99%5.52%2.93%6.62%7.94%2.69%3.96%4.38%3.44%3.83%1.57%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
13.38%14.33%14.47%10.96%9.35%8.66%8.14%7.58%13.49%7.27%5.55%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFEDX and MITTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MITTX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to LFEDX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEDX dropped -30.30% vs MITTX's -49.54%.

LFEDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFEDX and MITTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer