PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFEDX vs. FNSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFEDX vs. FNSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund (LFEDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFEDX achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than FNSDX's 12.04% return.


LFEDX

1D
0.82%
1M
0.10%
6M
4.76%
YTD
7.06%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
9.31%
ALL TIME*
9.06%

FNSDX

1D
2.26%
1M
-1.21%
6M
7.90%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LFEDX vs. FNSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFEDX
MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund
7.06%13.17%10.54%14.88%-14.86%17.24%12.82%25.16%-7.02%7.12%
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
12.04%23.81%14.18%20.65%-18.23%16.65%18.34%25.58%-8.85%7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEDX and FNSDX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.96

The correlation between LFEDX and FNSDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFEDX vs. FNSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFEDX
LFEDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LFEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LFEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSDX
FNSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFEDX vs. FNSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund (LFEDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFEDXFNSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.36

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

9.83

-1.17

LFEDX vs. FNSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFEDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FNSDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFEDX and FNSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFEDX vs. FNSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEDX drawdown since its inception was -30.30%, roughly equal to the maximum FNSDX drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEDX and FNSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFEDXFNSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.30%

-30.95%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

-9.76%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.79%

-15.44%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-27.31%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-2.49%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-5.54%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.33%

-0.94%

Volatility

LFEDX vs. FNSDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund (LFEDX) is 1.81%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that LFEDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFEDXFNSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

4.40%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

12.42%

-6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.60%

14.46%

-6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.87%

15.29%

-4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

16.03%

-3.55%

LFEDX vs. FNSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSDX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFEDX vs. FNSDX - Dividend Comparison

LFEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than FNSDX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
5.05%3.87%2.13%2.07%11.45%11.27%4.26%6.31%6.79%2.72%0.00%0.00%
LFEDX
MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund
7.46%7.99%5.52%2.93%6.62%7.94%2.69%3.96%4.38%3.44%3.83%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LFEDX and FNSDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNSDX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to LFEDX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEDX dropped -30.30% vs FNSDX's -30.95%.

LFEDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFEDX and FNSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer