LFAO vs. VGLT
LFAO (LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF) and VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. LFAO is actively managed, while VGLT is passively managed. Over the past year, LFAO returned -1.13% vs -1.67% for VGLT. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. LFAO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGLT.
Performance
LFAO vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFAO achieves a -2.61% return, which is significantly higher than VGLT's -3.26% return.
LFAO
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- -1.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.10%
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 1Y
- -1.67%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- -7.07%
- 10Y*
- -1.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.23K | $13.84K | $16.25K | |
| $95.69M | $98.86M | $108.97M |
LFAO vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LFAO LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF | -2.61% | 5.65% | -8.36% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -3.26% | 5.35% | -10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFAO and VGLT is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024 | 0.99 |
The correlation between LFAO and VGLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFAO vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank
LFAO
VGLT
LFAO vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF (LFAO) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFAO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.00 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | -0.05 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | -0.12 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFAO vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFAO drawdown since its inception was -10.12%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFAO and VGLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFAO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -46.18% | +36.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.86% | -7.03% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.78% | -38.64% | +32.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -15.26% | +10.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.19% | -0.60% |
Volatility
LFAO vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF (LFAO) is 1.78%, while Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that LFAO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFAO | VGLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.24% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.23% | 6.31% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.83% | 8.47% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.98% | 14.45% | -6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.98% | 13.75% | -5.77% |
LFAO vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFAO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LFAO vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison
LFAO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than VGLT's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFAO LifeX 2055 Longevity Income ETF | 11.20% | 14.33% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.37% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, LFAO and VGLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VGLT has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to LFAO (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFAO dropped -10.12% vs VGLT's -46.18%.
On 1-year performance, LFAO leads with -1.13% vs -1.67% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, LFAO has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LFAO has performed better with a -1.13% return vs -1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LFAO.
LFAO has the higher dividend yield at 11.20%, compared with 4.37% for VGLT.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LFAO and 0.03% for VGLT.
LFAO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFAO and VGLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer