LFAI vs. YGLD
LFAI (LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF) and YGLD (Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LFAI is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while YGLD is a Gold fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFAI returned 4.26% vs 23.02% for YGLD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LFAI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for YGLD.
Performance
LFAI vs. YGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFAI achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly higher than YGLD's -7.24% return.
LFAI
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YGLD
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -7.14%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFAI vs. YGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LFAI LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF | -0.43% | 6.06% | -2.76% |
YGLD Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF | -7.24% | 96.82% | -4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFAI and YGLD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFAI vs. YGLD — Risk / Return Rank
LFAI
YGLD
LFAI vs. YGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFAI | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 0.68 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 1.55 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFAI | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.57 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 1.17 | -1.33 |
Drawdowns
LFAI vs. YGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFAI drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum YGLD drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFAI and YGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFAI | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -34.23% | +25.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | -34.23% | +28.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | -33.06% | +29.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -7.91% | +4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 14.86% | -12.99% |
Volatility
LFAI vs. YGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI) is 2.03%, while Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that LFAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFAI | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 8.70% | -6.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.42% | 34.68% | -30.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.30% | 40.43% | -34.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.16% | 39.10% | -31.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.16% | 39.10% | -31.94% |
LFAI vs. YGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFAI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than YGLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFAI vs. YGLD - Dividend Comparison
LFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.55%, less than YGLD's 19.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LFAI LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF | 13.55% | 16.48% | 1.91% |
YGLD Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF | 19.23% | 12.05% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFAI and YGLD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YGLD has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to LFAI (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFAI dropped -8.64% vs YGLD's -34.23%.
On 1-year performance, YGLD leads with 23.02% vs 4.26% for LFAI. On fees, LFAI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LFAI has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YGLD has performed better with a 23.02% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LFAI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for YGLD.
YGLD has the higher dividend yield at 19.23%, compared with 13.55% for LFAI.
LFAI is categorized as Government Bonds, while YGLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LFAI and 0.50% for YGLD.
LFAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFAI and YGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer