LFAI vs. FAAR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LFAI (LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LFAI is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Stone Ridge, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFAI returned 3.49% vs 26.86% for FAAR. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. LFAI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.

Performance

LFAI vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFAI achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return.

LFAI

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: -0.02%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAAR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -4.34%
• YTD: 20.23%
• 6M: 19.92%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 7.89%
• 10Y*: 4.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFAI vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LFAI LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF	-0.05%	6.06%	-7.12%
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF	20.23%	8.07%	1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between LFAI and FAAR is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024	-0.18

The correlation between LFAI and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LFAI vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFAI

LFAI Risk / Return Rank: 16
LFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
LFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 15
LFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
LFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FAAR

FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 70
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFAI vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFAI	FAAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	2.02	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	2.89	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.35	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	4.75	-4.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.75	14.70	-12.95

LFAI vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFAI and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LFAI vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFAI drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFAI and FAAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFAI	FAAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.64%	-18.03%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.30%	-5.68%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-5.43%	+2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-7.82%	+4.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.89%	+0.10%

Volatility

LFAI vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI) is 1.58%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that LFAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFAI	FAAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	2.47%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.55%	9.68%	-5.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.18%	13.37%	-7.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.13%	12.95%	-5.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.13%	11.53%	-4.40%

LFAI vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFAI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFAI vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

LFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.50%, more than FAAR's 9.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF	9.57%	11.63%	3.45%	3.20%	5.82%	6.49%	3.05%	1.02%	0.58%	2.83%
LFAI LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF	13.50%	16.48%	1.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFAI and FAAR in my portfolio?

LFAI and FAAR have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFAI or FAAR?

FAAR has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to LFAI (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFAI dropped -8.64% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

Which ETF is better, LFAI or FAAR?

On 1-year performance, FAAR leads with 26.86% vs 3.49% for LFAI. On fees, LFAI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LFAI has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LFAI or FAAR?

Over the 1-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 26.86% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFAI or FAAR?

LFAI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFAI or FAAR?

LFAI has the higher dividend yield at 13.50%, compared with 9.57% for FAAR.

What is the main difference between LFAI and FAAR?

LFAI is categorized as Government Bonds, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LFAI and 0.95% for FAAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.