PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFAI vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFAI vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFAI achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return.


LFAI

1D
0.15%
1M
0.15%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
79.50%
6M
72.59%
1Y
82.31%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFAI vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LFAI
LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF
-0.12%6.06%-7.12%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.50%-2.17%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LFAI and DBE is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFAI vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFAI
LFAI Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
LFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFAI vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFAIDBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

2.37

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

2.91

-1.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.39

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

6.10

-5.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.13

11.98

-9.85

LFAI vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFAI and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFAIDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

2.37

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.09

-0.22

Drawdowns

LFAI vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFAI drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFAI and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFAIDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-86.69%

+78.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

-14.41%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-31.85%

+28.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-57.31%

+53.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

7.34%

-5.48%

Volatility

LFAI vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF (LFAI) is 2.08%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that LFAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFAIDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

13.47%

-11.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

30.80%

-26.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.31%

35.02%

-28.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.16%

29.37%

-22.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.16%

28.33%

-21.17%

LFAI vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFAI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFAI vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

LFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.23%, more than DBE's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.15%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
LFAI
LifeX 2050 Longevity Income ETF
13.51%16.48%1.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LFAI and DBE have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to LFAI (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFAI dropped -8.64% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 82.31% vs 4.46% for LFAI. On fees, LFAI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LFAI has been the lower-risk option at 2.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 82.31% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LFAI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

LFAI has the higher dividend yield at 14.23%, compared with 2.15% for DBE.

LFAI is categorized as Government Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LFAI and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFAI and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer