PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEXCX vs. FGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEXCX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEXCX achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 18.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LEXCX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.84% annualized return.


LEXCX

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
15.98%
6M
15.38%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
11.73%

FGINX

1D
0.50%
1M
3.31%
YTD
18.91%
6M
17.93%
1Y
42.76%
3Y*
26.31%
5Y*
17.07%
10Y*
13.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEXCX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
15.98%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
18.91%29.78%15.13%11.98%3.03%21.37%-0.08%25.64%-10.27%18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LEXCX and FGINX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 1993

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between LEXCX and FGINX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEXCX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FGINX
FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEXCX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEXCXFGINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.67

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

6.01

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

22.76

-14.55

LEXCX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEXCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEXCX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEXCX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEXCX drawdown since its inception was -50.42%, smaller than the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEXCX and FGINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEXCXFGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.42%

-54.80%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-7.34%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-13.28%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.75%

-16.21%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.21%

-37.37%

-1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-0.84%

-3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-9.68%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.93%

+0.57%

Volatility

LEXCX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 4.09%. This indicates that LEXCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEXCXFGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.09%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

8.77%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

11.79%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

14.91%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

17.06%

+1.96%

LEXCX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEXCX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEXCX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

LEXCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than FGINX's 9.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
9.26%11.28%12.40%7.11%7.04%11.97%6.59%51.75%25.36%5.13%4.12%5.66%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.42%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEXCX and FGINX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to FGINX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEXCX dropped -50.42% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEXCX and FGINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer